PreenFM > preenfm2 and preenfm3

New F.M. physical materials tutorial video on Youtube

(1/2) > >>

element-s:
HI all,

you might be interested in this series for experimenting with the FM1 and 2 and other FM machines

https://youtu.be/CdPa6VLi4GQ

Toltekradiation:
a bump to this underated thread.. :D
thanks you element-s for posting, very nice work, really inspiring !
just found the other videos, i like it all :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXo_493fEpU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xL3qr-9-ZE

Nonov Yurbiz:
Hi @Toltekradiation. Are you Cevorkum in YouTube? How do you represent feedback in PreenFM2? Examples in these videos have feedback in one operator. Thanks.


--- Quote from: Toltekradiation on June 08, 2019, 06:31:50 PM ---a bump to this underated thread.. :D
thanks you element-s for posting, very nice work, really inspiring !
just found the other videos, i like it all :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXo_493fEpU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xL3qr-9-ZE


--- End quote ---

Toltekradiation:
hi NonovYurbiz,
no, i'm not Cevorkum..
to simulate feedback on the pfm2, you can use the different waveforms :
the more feedback, the more harmonics will be added, so for a medium feedback, use the sawtooth waveform, for high feedback, use noise.

widdly:
I'm confused by these videos.  The ratios don't match what I hear.

For example in the Metal video for the first sound, he shows operator 4 with a DX ratio of 21.98.  He labels this operator as the fundamental and plays it with the other operators turned off and you can hear a fairly low note.  That doesn't make sense. 

Has any been able to get similar sounds using his quoted ratios? 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page