61
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: July 12, 2021, 10:19:06 PM »
Dude, this is amazing work!! You never fail to impress.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: July 09, 2021, 05:09:13 AM »
That would be awesome!
63
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: June 29, 2021, 05:32:10 AM »
Very excited about this reverb.
64
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: June 27, 2021, 04:30:30 AM »
Are the two Master FX in series or Parallel? and how would I control the mix between the two? I see the wet/dry option in the Mix page, but was not sure if it was both FX or just the reverb. seems like both...
65
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: June 26, 2021, 10:48:06 PM »
Nice! I am super excited to try this out. Any warnings/suggestions re: the settings?
66
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: PreenFM2 new build, audio is mostly noise
« on: May 20, 2021, 05:48:37 PM »
If your soldering iron tip is busted, definitely get a new tip. Also, I suggest you buy some flux and use it to reflow the bad solder joints.
67
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: PFM3 display black
« on: May 10, 2021, 03:51:42 PM »
Looks really nice in black!
68
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: May 08, 2021, 03:56:53 AM »
Tried out the global FX. very cool. I am having fun with the tremolo.
69
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: envelope segments
« on: May 01, 2021, 08:10:45 PM »
Oh, the Decay segment is exponential. I didn't realize that. I wrongly assumed it was linear based on the linear representation in the editor. I should have looked in the code.
A logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function. However, I think I actually meant exponential.
Thanks. :-)
A logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function. However, I think I actually meant exponential.
Thanks. :-)
70
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Pfm2 : unison discussion
« on: April 27, 2021, 02:50:26 AM »
@Xavier is it possible to add a new feature where we can set a negative key follow to modulate detune amount?
I was thinking this would cure an issue with detune (in all synths) where a larger detune amount which sounds great at low notes, often sounds like too much at high notes. I am not envisioning this as a real time modulation, instead only at note on.
I was thinking this would cure an issue with detune (in all synths) where a larger detune amount which sounds great at low notes, often sounds like too much at high notes. I am not envisioning this as a real time modulation, instead only at note on.
71
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / envelope segments
« on: April 26, 2021, 02:15:49 AM »
Is there a way to make the segments of the envelopes logarithmic (maybe using the mod matrix)? Specifically the decay segment.
72
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: global fx attempt
« on: April 23, 2021, 11:33:28 PM »
Awesome idea! I'll try your code out later this weekend.
Can you post an audio file example?
Regarding aliasing, is it possible that some judicious use of a one pole LPF could ameliorate the aliasing?
Can you post an audio file example?
Regarding aliasing, is it possible that some judicious use of a one pole LPF could ameliorate the aliasing?
73
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: PreenFM2 r6 no boot after build
« on: March 25, 2021, 11:28:23 PM »
Sounds like a USB stick issue. You may want to try a different USB stick.
74
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: master effects for pfm3 suggestions
« on: March 22, 2021, 02:34:54 PM »
I'm not familiar with the Haas Effect.
I looked it up and it seems like you make a second copy of the sound delayed by 5 and 35 ms and pan the original hard to one side and the slightly delayed version hard to the other side. Is that accurate? If so, that seems like it would be relatively easy to code.
However, I figure that patch would have to be summed to mono before applying this effect.
I looked it up and it seems like you make a second copy of the sound delayed by 5 and 35 ms and pan the original hard to one side and the slightly delayed version hard to the other side. Is that accurate? If so, that seems like it would be relatively easy to code.
However, I figure that patch would have to be summed to mono before applying this effect.
75
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Pfm2 : unison discussion
« on: March 12, 2021, 02:21:46 PM »
Ahh, I was using 3.1.2 in PFM2 mode. I just updated to 3.1.3 based on your post and it fixed my issue.
Thanks. Accordingly, there is no bug. It was operator (me) error.
Thanks. Accordingly, there is no bug. It was operator (me) error.