Recent Posts

21

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by Toltekradiation on September 06, 2019, 11:21:00 AM »

@maki : thanks for the info, i wasn't aware of this. It may be possible to add a 4 points fm shaper on each slot, would have to make a poc.
Anyway, it's too much work for me at the moment, maybe in some months.

22

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by baxgas on September 06, 2019, 07:22:41 AM »

@Toltekradiation definitely dive in to sound design, you deserve a bit fun also after the hard work on engineering ;-)
I hope these improvements will also get in to the "official" OS. @Xavier?

23

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by maki on September 06, 2019, 06:11:52 AM »

Tracking generator, as implemented in Oberheim Matrix, Alesis Ion, Alesis Micron, Akai Miniak, called "table" in Alesis Fusion and "edir user curve" in Control assign in Yamaha Montage/Modx is a user defined respons on input in modulation matrix. In this case, instead of having one breakpoint and a few functions left and right form the break point, user could define whatever 8,16 or 32 points response curve, giving much more detailed response. On my Miniak I can distribute fm over the keyboard on many more ways than cust according to a few math curves.This function alone gives tremendous variety of flavours. It looks very simple, like an array of 8,16 or 32 places, each containg a user editable number in range from -127 to +127.

24

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by Toltekradiation on September 05, 2019, 09:11:33 PM »

hi @maki, i guess you would like to have the parameter 2 available in the modulation matrix ?
if so, i tried to, but it failed.. (exception crash) because of my lack of understanding the structure of some part of the code (matrixParameterRow), and, according to the code comment( https://github.com/pvig/preenfm2/blob/master/src/synth/SynthState.cpp#L314), 8 destination target were removed in firmware 2.0, i think for a good reason, so i gave up...
for now, i use my digitakt to control param2 by CC, so i don't think i will dig this, sorry.
or maybe i misunderstood, what do you mean by tracking generator ?

25

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by maki on September 05, 2019, 07:50:45 PM »

Hello, could you then make a tracking generator for each slot in Modulation Matrix?

26

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by Toltekradiation on September 05, 2019, 06:38:15 PM »

hi guys!
i'm very glad you're enjoying my work !
i may leave the version like that, but don't hesitate to suggest ideas or requests,
it seem usable enough, so, i don't plan to add any other fx or change the fx list.
maybe polish it a bit, but would have better to really dive into sound design now .

27

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by kyoto on September 05, 2019, 03:28:52 PM »

good work - thank you very much

28

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by baxgas on September 05, 2019, 03:17:27 PM »

@Toltekradiation Thank you for the improvements, now it works really smoothly at my PreenFM2, fantastic 
I will test it thoroughly and let you know if I find some more tips for improvement, but for now it seems really-really great!
One thing I noticed with the file-naming is that the OS Flasher recognises the .bin only if it's filename is starting with p2_ Otherwise it is great you renamed them, so the filename truncation is much more informative!

Just a question, will the position of the effects move in some future version (planning adding some more), so I can track which parameters were saved with the patches? Now the old patches load in with a bit different FX, I guess because it saves the ID, and it changes if some new are added before.

Thank you so much for the great job you done with these improvements!

29

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by Toltekradiation on September 05, 2019, 10:14:23 AM »

here is the adcIn version

30

PreenFM2 / Re: New filters

« Last post by Toltekradiation on September 05, 2019, 10:08:10 AM »

good news, i found the "float cast" optimization and it make a big difference ,
i could bring back oversample on the lp3, hp3, bp3, peak filters !
for a test, i could have 4 parts running fast with per step program change, and it kept smooth !
the other optimizations was a good thing anyway..