Recent Posts

81

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on July 19, 2024, 07:30:24 PM »

ok, here is a reworked version that may suit better,
there is more resonance as it's 2 poles instead of previously 1.
With modulation, it may sound vocal on some types of sounds !

82

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by matrix12x on July 10, 2024, 05:41:40 AM »

cool video. Yeah, thats the exact sound that inspired this idea.
I look forward to what you come up with next.

83

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on July 07, 2024, 07:40:47 PM »

i found a video that show some example of that Triton fx :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZasgoU6j7lg

that give me some urge to rework my version !

84

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on June 30, 2024, 09:56:15 PM »

there is more than just bass going thru,
finally i went for a soft lowpass version of the input to be mixed with the two bandpass filters.
i think it sounds better balanced this way.

85

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by matrix12x on June 30, 2024, 08:27:42 PM »

thanks. Playing it now. Sounds even better with the bass. :-)

86

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on June 30, 2024, 01:31:53 PM »

yes, it needs some clarifications :

in the new version attached, things go like this :

The frequency of the bp filters is (f + spread) and (f - spread) for Left and Right channels, folded around -1, 1
Spread param is now bipolar, so at value 0.5, actual spread = 0

The Spread param is not accessible from the matrix, only from the ui and midi CC
From the matrix, the frequency of the bandpass filters is reachable (= f)


Edit : lowpassed signal now go through.

87

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by matrix12x on June 29, 2024, 05:49:45 PM »

After playing for a while, I agree re: bass. I noticed that over the range of the mix parameter, I am always playing under 0.6 or so with this effect or it gets oo thin, which makes sense because it is a BPF.

Question: modulating FX2 parameter 1, modulates spread?
Maybe spread should be hard coded to max, and the parameter should be cutoff freq.

88

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on June 29, 2024, 08:07:18 AM »

Cool,
yes i like it as well, it give nice textures

i think it may benefit letting some bass go through it,
to give a little more body, like frequencies <150 hz.

i did things like that for the flanger, chorus.

89

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by matrix12x on June 29, 2024, 04:39:19 AM »

Nice. 
It sounds exactly like I had hoped. I'm going to play with it and do some sound design tomorrow. I'm really excited about this. 

@toltekradiation great job as always!!

90

preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter

« Last post by Toltekradiation on June 27, 2024, 07:51:14 PM »

ok, here is a first version

it's two bp filters, done in paraphonic mode,
so there is a dry/wet parameter and two params : Spread and Reso
it can be modulated from the matrix.