PreenFM > preenfm2 and preenfm3

pfm2 : 2.21

<< < (28/33) > >>

Xavier:
Thanks for the suggestions.

Algorithm and oscillator shape controled by matrix would lead to audio glitch (in a bad way such as digital "click") , so i don't think it's a good idea to have it as part of the "out of the box" engine.
Triggering the enveloppe with other LFO value is not easy.

And i admit having all free envelope parameters would be cool  ;)

Xavier:

A little new release 2.10 is available :
https://github.com/Ixox/preenfm2/releases

audiowanderer:
Just checked the latest firmware and goes pretty sweet.
I had some problems saving and accessing via usb cable to the usb stick with the 2.08b and now those problems are gone.
Great job.

kyoto:
Xavier, thnx very much for your work and great fm maschine ;)

is it possible to build in the firmware new options please:
1) master tune parameter with range for example (428 - 450 Hz)?
2) different types of LP filter (12db/18db/24db)
3) more user waves for operators (now the default is only 6)
4) Do you plan to add to the preenfm2 editor work with banks of sounds and patches?


Xavier:
Hi thanks for the nice words and thanks for the suggestions.

I'm afraid the replies to your questions are :

1. Yes but you can already do that with the scala file (not ideal i agree).
http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/scl_format.html
I think someone already made a custom firmware with this. I would need to merge it.

2. I don't think i'll ever do that. But who knows. FM synthesis should not rely on filters ;) even it's it's a good to have.

3. No it's limited by the memory of the preenfm2 which is already full.

4. No, that would be too much work.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version