1
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Preenfm3 modal resonator
« on: January 18, 2026, 04:30:34 AM »
it basically replaces the firmware on your Preen FM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Preenfm3 modal resonator
« on: November 03, 2025, 11:29:20 PM »
awesome!! I'm going to check that out
3
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: October 06, 2024, 07:18:45 PM »
Sorry for the delay. Where do I find the compressor? (which menu)
4
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: September 18, 2024, 09:47:39 PM »
I really love the way it sounds. The latest version works well on my unit. (as they all did)
5
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: August 13, 2024, 04:44:45 AM »
any luck with the limiter?
6
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: July 22, 2024, 12:32:57 AM »
Nice! :-)
much better re: clipping.
much better re: clipping.
7
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: July 21, 2024, 02:26:26 AM »
very cool. I'm having fun playing with the modulation on it.
When I use a high mix amount, (at high resonance) it occasionally clips on some patches I made with it. the prior version did not clip at the same settings.
When I use a high mix amount, (at high resonance) it occasionally clips on some patches I made with it. the prior version did not clip at the same settings.
8
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: July 10, 2024, 05:41:40 AM »
cool video. Yeah, thats the exact sound that inspired this idea.
I look forward to what you come up with next.
I look forward to what you come up with next.
9
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 30, 2024, 08:27:42 PM »
thanks. Playing it now. Sounds even better with the bass. :-)
10
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 29, 2024, 05:49:45 PM »
After playing for a while, I agree re: bass. I noticed that over the range of the mix parameter, I am always playing under 0.6 or so with this effect or it gets oo thin, which makes sense because it is a BPF.
Question: modulating FX2 parameter 1, modulates spread?
Maybe spread should be hard coded to max, and the parameter should be cutoff freq.
Question: modulating FX2 parameter 1, modulates spread?
Maybe spread should be hard coded to max, and the parameter should be cutoff freq.
11
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 29, 2024, 04:39:19 AM »
Nice. 
It sounds exactly like I had hoped. I'm going to play with it and do some sound design tomorrow. I'm really excited about this.
@toltekradiation great job as always!!
It sounds exactly like I had hoped. I'm going to play with it and do some sound design tomorrow. I'm really excited about this.
@toltekradiation great job as always!!
12
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 26, 2024, 01:43:52 AM »
That block diagram for the Stereo Random Filter is exactly what I was thinking about implementing. Maybe the parameters should be 1) phase and 2)mix (wet/dry). I'm not sure why I remembered it as auto filter.
How would I take the current BPF code and modulate it like in this block diagram? or is it really 2 BPFs (L and R) code wise?
We could use the existing LFO and a mod matrix slot to modulate it.
How would I take the current BPF code and modulate it like in this block diagram? or is it really 2 BPFs (L and R) code wise?
We could use the existing LFO and a mod matrix slot to modulate it.
13
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 26, 2024, 01:02:57 AM »
yep thats it exactly.
14
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Idea for a new PFM3 FX auto filter
« on: June 22, 2024, 11:34:47 PM »
I was recently playing with a Korg Triton... and one of the FX in the Triton would be great here, the "auto filter."
So, its basically 2 band pass filters where one is hard panned right and has panned left. An LFO modulates the cutoff freq of the first BPF and the same LFO but 180 out of phase modulates the second BPF. LFO waveform is the "random" waveform. resonance/Q is set relatively high (but not self oscillating).
Parameters could be:
LFO Rate
Mix (mixing filtered and unfiltered sound)
How this differs from using the current BPF and modulating that using the existing LFOs is the second BPF being modulated 180 out of phase with the first one for a nice stereo effect and the "mix" parameter. this gives a good amount of motion to pads. In the existing BPF, you can't mix the un filtered sound with the filtered sound.
Thoughts?
I would probably start with the existing BPF code.
So, its basically 2 band pass filters where one is hard panned right and has panned left. An LFO modulates the cutoff freq of the first BPF and the same LFO but 180 out of phase modulates the second BPF. LFO waveform is the "random" waveform. resonance/Q is set relatively high (but not self oscillating).
Parameters could be:
LFO Rate
Mix (mixing filtered and unfiltered sound)
How this differs from using the current BPF and modulating that using the existing LFOs is the second BPF being modulated 180 out of phase with the first one for a nice stereo effect and the "mix" parameter. this gives a good amount of motion to pads. In the existing BPF, you can't mix the un filtered sound with the filtered sound.
Thoughts?
I would probably start with the existing BPF code.
15
preenfm2 and preenfm3 / Re: filtering USB +5V line
« on: February 26, 2024, 12:22:29 AM »
@Xavier Exactly. Let me know if you want me to run before and after plots of the USB supply noise. I don't mind un-soldering and remeasuring.